CALL FOR PAPERS
Association for Linguistic Typology 8th Biennial
Meeting (ALT8)
Typology and the study of language: Comparative grammar and
beyond
University of California, Berkeley
July 23-26, 2009
Website: http://lsa2009.berkeley.edu/alt8
Abstracts on any topic in typology are invited for 20-minute
papers, posters, and possibly a limited number of workshops. Non-members of ALT may submit abstracts
but will be expected to join ALT in order to present a paper at the meeting.
ALT website: http://www.linguistic-typology.org/
Deadline for receipt of abstracts: January 12, 2009
Notification by Monday, March 2.
The Program Committee has taken into consideration the
consensus of the 2007 meeting:
three simultaneous sessions is the maximum we can handle; conference
workdays should not be uncomfortably long or without breaks; members submitting
abstracts should be able to be confident that a good abstract will be accepted
(i.e. the acceptance rate should
not be too low); standards should be stringent enough that only good
abstracts are accepted; workshops during the conference sessions should be
limited in number and their presentations should strictly adhere to the timing
and quality constraints on regular papers.
FOR
MORE ON WORKSHOPS, SEE BELOW.
How to submit an abstract:
One individual
may be involved in a maximum of two papers (maximum of one as sole
author). A workshop presentation
by one person counts as a single-author paper.
Send your
abstract as an email attachment to:
alt8@berkeley.edu
Subject
header: (your last name)
alt8 abstract
e.g.:
hyman alt8 abstract
(If
you have a common last name, it's helpful to us if you also include an initial: e.g. jnichols alt8 abstract.)
Include these
things in the body of the email:
Author's
name(s)
Abstract
title
For
workshops: title of workshop and
authors and titles of all workshop papers
Contact
information: email, phone, fax
Abstract specifications:
Maximum length:
500 words or 1 single-spaced page
Abstracts and papers should be in English.
Put this information at the top of your abstract:
The
title.
Category: oral; poster; either oral or poster;
TPI poster (see below)
Format: If at all possible, please send your
abstract as a pdf.
Anonymity: Abstracts must be anonymous. Do not put your name or other
identifying information on the abstract.
Also, please anonymize your pdf by removing identifying information. In
general this can be done by using the following two pull-down menus:
File
> document properties > description (remove name of author)
View
> comments (though
an abstract is unlikely to have comments, check this and remove any comments,
as they will show your username)
View
> review tracker (ditto)
If it's your own
copy of the software, you might also check:
Acrobat
> preferences > identity (to
keep your identity off of this and other pdf's, leave all the fields blank)
Give your pdf a
filename similar to the subject header, e.g.:
hyman_alt8_abstract.pdf
Categories of submission:
Individual
oral presentations (single or multiple
author). 20 minutes + 10 minutes
for discussion.
Posters. One
or more poster sessions will be organized, depending on demand.
Oral
or poster. This means you prefer an oral presentation but can also do a
poster. If there are more good
abstracts than we can accommodate, the Program Committee will schedule some as
posters.
If
you choose either category "poster" or "oral or poster" you
will increase your chances of acceptance.
Workshops.
Both the sense of the 2007 meeting and the realities of competition for
rooms during the busy UC Berkeley summer session dictate that we have very few
workshops during ALT 8. (A
workshop is a thematically unified organized session held at the same time as
other sessions.) We will probably
schedule all workshops during the same time, likely Sunday afternoon, July
26. Please note the following
policies:
Each
workshop presenter sends in an abstract for their presentation. The workshop organizer also sends in an
abstract for the workshop, about half a page to a page in length. (Workshop organizers can collect the
individual abstracts and attach them all to a single submission email, or have
their presenters send in their own individual abstracts. Either way is OK.)
Each
abstract will be reviewed in the same way as non-workshop individual papers,
and will be individually accepted or not.
The whole workshop abstract will also be competitively reviewed. If all the individual abstracts and the
workshop abstract are accepted, the workshop will be scheduled as a
workshop. If not, the accepted
papers will be scheduled as regular individual presentations (and may be
scheduled together, as we will aim for thematic unity of conference sessions
where possible). In the case of a
close call (e.g. a workshop with all but one presentation accepted; all
presentations accepted but workshop proposal not accepted; etc.) the Program
Committee will try to resolve things in as member-friendly a way as possible.
Maximum
number of papers per workshop: 6 (or
5 if the introduction is more than a few sentences). A workshop must fit into a 3-hour time slot.
TPI
posters: Typology and public
interest. Meeting on a large busy campus during the LSA Institute and
the general Summer Session gives typologists an opportunity to communicate to
non-typologists and non-linguistics why and how typology is interesting and
what important discoveries are being made in typology. Therefore we plan to schedule an over-quota
TPI poster and if possible a competition to pick the posters (TPI and other) that do the
best job of communicating the interest of typology and/or typological phenomena
of interest, and display the winners for a longer time in a prominent display
cabinet in one of the important campus buildings. By "over quota" we mean that TPI posters can be a
second single-author abstract.
With this TPI poster session and competition we hope to inspire members
to mobilize their graphic, communicative, and analytic skills to produce
compelling posters on such topics as:
¥
Typological rarities and other phenomena of interest, previously published or
not. These might include findings
from recent fieldwork for which you have a squib-like presentation, phenomena
noted in published literature, proposed correlations, etc.
¥
Public communications making clear in not-too-technical terms the interest of
something you have already published or are publishing (or e.g. presenting at
this conference).
¥
Examples of best practice in typological work
¥
Demonstrations of software and its applications
¥
Teaching materials, curriculum, etc.